Santa Cruz Vacation Rentals Under Scrutiny

In response to growing complaints from localSome of these homes cost as much as $5000
residents, Santa Cruz County Planning Departmentfor a weekend, and on some streets there are
are getting together next week to devise a newalmost a dozen rentals.
set of regulations for owners of vacation rentalsMost of the rental home owners claim they are
located between Santa Cruz Harbor and Pleasurerenting just to pay the bills as a result of lost
Point.jobs, or increased mortgage payments - if it
A Committee including Planning Departmentwasn't for the rent payments, they may lose
officials, residents and vacation home owners willtheir homes altogether.
propose a set of recommendations to beThis area is highly dependant on tourism, and
reviewed and approved by the Board ofmany felt that cutting back on vacation rentals
Supervisors. They are hoping to have thiswould do more harm than good, especially since
wrapped up and in place by spring 2011.there are no hotels in the immediate area.
The problem started when real estate in aResident Chuck Oliver feels each case should be
primarily residential area experienced a growingaddressed individually, "we need people to start
conversion of vacation rentals resulting in a largebeing accountable and we can't punish 90 percent
population of tourists. Most tenants are just fine,for what 10 percent are doing." Unfortunately,
but there is a small percentage that have becomemost rules are instigated because of that
such a nuisance that the neighborhood isdisruptive 10 percent, says Supervisor John
frequently being disrupted. There have beenLeopold.
growing incidents of loud partying, drunkeness,The suggestion that rentals be restricted to a
street fights, littered properties, cars blockingminimum 7 days was met with strong disapproval
driveways, and resulting police calls - at least 10 infrom landlords. In fact, most rely on weekends
the last six months.and 2 or 3 day rentals for the majority of their
The difficult part is devising a plan that will satisfybusiness. In this economy, not all families can
both long term residents and rental home owners,afford to vacation for extended periods.
and that will establish some sort of regulationOriginally, new regulations were to apply to only
without going overboard. Some of thethe Live Oak community, but Supervisor Ellen Pirie
recommendations include:suggested it should include Seacliff, Rio del Mar
- landlords to pay for cost of police action afterand La Selva Beach as well. All of these
an incidentneighborhoods are seeing a steady growth in
- ban on large events such as stag parties,short term rentals.
wedding receptions, business retreatsOther communities that regulate vacation rentals
- guests should be required to stay a miniumuminclude Capitola which requires a permit and
of 1 weekbusiness license, and puts restraints on rental
- signs posted displaying contact information oflocations. Monterey and Carmel address the issue
landlord in the event of problemsby banning short term rentals in all residential
Resident, Margaret Macksey of Live Oak,areas.
complains, "we live in a residential neighborhoodOnce these businesses become regulated, and
and we are surrounded by commercial properties."order is somewhat restored, one has to wonder
Others describe the area as fraternity row, andif long time residents will ever feel comfortable.
feel that if these short term rentals are going toAfter all, the face of their quiet neighborhoods is
operate as businesses, they should be licensedevolving, and it will be up to them to decide
and regulated as commercial establishments.whether this is a place they still want to call home.